In the next 10 years we will see implant under the skin that will hold medical information, personal passports and possible personal information. To further the research in this area we will need a collaborative means to complete. The typical Delphi method and the modified NGT process will give us an approach that will bring the leading researchers together to combine experience, research, literature and possible implementations that is already in use. The Delphi wiki gives the experts the means to combine their research, ask the questions, and discuss the pilot studies. The other method of approach is the modified NGT processes which will in the research part, gives personnel in the study the ability to ask questions and give feedback on their own progress. This will give the medical study a more rounded approach without interfering with progress and get essential and vital results that could be life saving and does not deter the results found.
Moving forward in this innovation, there are two possible forces that could impede the process. One process that could impede the advancement is legal/ethical means of gathering information from the device. Devices like these will need to be protected and read through technological means that is only available to medical staff and hospitals. The other is the governmental regulation over the personnel information being disclosed. The protection of people in the medical or corporate environments falls under the HIPPA law. This law will need to be looked into further to ensure the law confides to this technology.
On the other hand there are major forces that can support the implementation of the devices. The means of protecting and ensuring the patient is able to get the proper treatment. These medical devices give doctors the advantages that they would normally not have. There is technological support that can develop into more advance devices that can do more, like discussed in the Bionic Woman story. Having advancements in technology like this can lead to more innovation in the field where wires and bulky devices are smaller and self contained to save people.
When our committee meets on this innovation advancement, we need to have open and closed collaboration. If we use a closed collaboration approach by itself, we do not get a bias opinion on areas that are being overlooked. If we use the open approach by itself, we get a more general approach and not able to get into the detail of the specifics of the study. By combining the collaboration between researchers and subjects we can refine the technology or advancements in the proper direction with excellent results to help save lives. The board is able to bring all information back to ensure focus in the area of research.
References
1. ICT Results (2008, January 18). Medical Implants: The Inside Story. ScienceDaily
2. Cornish, E. (2004). Futuring - the exploration or the future. Bethesda, Maryland: World Future Society.
3. Skulmoski, G, Hartman, F, & Krahn, J. (2007). The delphi method for graduate research. Volume 6, 3.
4. Dobbie, A, Rhodes, M, Tysinger, J, & Freeman, J. (2004). Using a modified nominal group technique as a curriculum evaluation tool. FamilyMedicine, 36(6), 2-4.